Nick Heath

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 2,596 through 2,610 (of 4,427 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Greenland paddle leash #18939
    Mick Allen

    I think a leash would have a possibility to interfere a bit with sliding strokes or extended paddle roll, sculling support, recovery techniques, or leanbacks . . . but might not be a deal breaker though.  Maybe worth trying out variations [coaming, waist, wrist connections] to see what works best while really thrashing around, heh heh.

    Paddle finish seems to typically be oil, but I see no real reason to eliminate a slight textured varnish finish.  Personally, I would just  use a hard ‘finish’ if I was concerned about paddle strength or abrasion resistance and wished to add a little appropriate [to a specific paddle issue] glass reinforcement.

    And not too many 2 pc greenland paddles out there, although I do have [given to me] one with a fairly un-aesthetic stainless ferrule that I wish wasn’t there.   I haven’t used it but it just seems counter to whatever looks and feels that a greenland paddle should be. If you are really interested in this, we could meet halfway somewhere and you could borrow it until things get more normal.

    anyway, some ideas

    in reply to: General Discussion #18936
    Former Member

    Has anyone used a leash on their Greenland Paddle? If so what are your comments? Does it interfere with the stroke? Should the paddle be varnished bright or oil finished? One piece or two?

    And Happy Holidays to all.

    Cheers, Thom

    in reply to: Broken Group Proposed Permanent Winter Closure #18929
    Nick Heath

    I think members of out club should be concerned about this. The precedent is significant if it were to spread to other park managers, such as BC Parks. We accept some off-season closures to prevent vandalism  etc. in easy-to- access sites, but I don’t think leaving these paddle-in sites open for use has caused any  appreciable maintenance needs or damage.

    I could accept seasonal closures for sufficient reason e.g. to allow hunting at Sidney I, allow nesting birds some peace and quiet in the Spring etc. Perhaps there is a valid rationale? I guess Parks Canada will be trying to come up with one by 15 Jan.

    In the meantime, Trans Canada Trail is trying hard to get sections of the ‘Great Trail’ prepared for winter use, by offering incentive grants – this is recognition of much higher usage this pandemic year.

    I’d like to see our club represented at this session with Parks Canada.

    BTW BC Parks permanently closed the paddle-in/walk-in campsite at Smuggler Cove in a somewhat sneaky fashion.

    in reply to: Broken Group Proposed Permanent Winter Closure #18928
    Yekaterina Yushmanova

    There is an interesting discussion happening on West Coast Paddler for those who are interested https://www.westcoastpaddler.com/community/threads/broken-group-permanently-closed-during-fall-winter-spring.8916/

    in reply to: Broken Group Proposed Permanent Winter Closure #18927
    Yekaterina Yushmanova

    Glad to hear that a meeting is happening, hopefully we will be able to hear some insights into what is going on.

    in reply to: Broken Group Proposed Permanent Winter Closure #18926
    Former Member

    If I am understanding this correctly, the Parks Canada plan for the 2021 season is to not allow overnight visits to the park, and to close the area entirely in the off-season?

    I don’t understand the math on those decisions at all.

    in reply to: Broken Group Proposed Permanent Winter Closure #18922
    Mike Gilbert

    So everyone is aware, I am planning to attend the January 15th, 2021 meeting with Parks Canada on behalf of Paddle Canada.  Paddle Canada does lobbying on behalf of its instructor members and all registrants to our Courses, clinic and classes.

    The meeting with Parks Canada will include Paddle Canada, Sea Kayak Guides Alliance of BC, First Nations and several commercial guides, operators, outfitters and paddle businesses all of whom would be negatively affected should summer openings not include overnight multi-day expeditions and winter closures (Oct.1 – April 30th) come into effect.

    There have already been preliminary meetings and communication regarding our concerns with proposed changes to the future use of BGI.  We are hoping that the coming meeting(s) will provide insight, understanding, cooperation and decisions that are balanced and fair to all concerned parties regarding the year round use of BGI.

    in reply to: Broken Group Proposed Permanent Winter Closure #18921
    Former Member

    A meeting has been scheduled by Parks Canada for stakeholders next January 15. SKILS and BC Marine Trails will be attending.

    The timing is both good and bad. Good in that this is a fairly prompt response from Parks Canada. Bad in that many people will miss this important discussion because of the year end holidays.

    As Katya has mentioned above, now is the time to voice your concerns by emailing them to those managers at Parks Canada responsible for Pacific Rim National Park Reserve:

    Dave Tovell, Visitor Experience Manager at Pacific Rim National Park Reserve
    dave.tovell@canada.ca

    Karen Haugen, Superintendent at Pacific Rim National Park Reserve
    karen.haugen@canada.ca

    You can also share your concerns and ask questions about trails access on the BC Marine Trails forum: Trails Development (registration required)

    in reply to: General Discussion #18919
    Yekaterina Yushmanova

    Hello paddlers,

    I keep hearing disturbing news from a number of sources that there is a plan for the permanent full closure of the BGI (Broken Group Islands) from October 1 to April 30. I can not find any official info on the Parks Canada website and do not believe that any public consultation has taken place.
    Here is the newsletter excerpt from SKILS (outfitter from Ucluelet):
    User and camping fees for the BGI are currently only collected online from May 1 to September 30. For the past decades, guides as well as recreational kayakers and boaters were able to enjoy the Broken Group Islands all year round, although no fees were collected from October to April. In 2020, permanent closure of the Broken Group Islands outside of the fee-collecting period was made with absolutely no consultation and was not communicated. One local outfitter learned this after a random exchange with the Visitor Experience Manager of the Pacific Rim National Park Reserve.

    Outfitters were then told that the BGI is closed during the off-season because there are no Parks Staff there during that time. Parks Canada has not demonstrated by documentation or statistics, evidence that justifies closing the BGI. We think kayaking outfitters and recreational kayakers should continue to have access to the BGI all year for the following reasons.

    During the fee collecting season in the BGI, Parks Canada do not have any permanent staff in the BGI and they do not stay overnight. Therefore, a lack of Park Canada staff in the winter is not a logical reason to close the park. There are friendly Beach Keepers on Keith island during the Summer but they are not properly trained to perform rescues or advanced first aid in remote areas, so their presence does not make it significantly ‘safer’. The nearby permanent Coast Guard station in Bamfield is well located and equipped to perform rescues if necessary. Nearby Ucluelet also has an auxiliary Coast Guard station.

    Furthermore, the application of this decision does not make sense due to the lack enforcement and the very porous border of the Broken Group Islands with a lot of visitors transiting in this area all year round by human powered or motor boats.

    Suggestions
    1.      Allow access to the Broken Group Island all year round.
    2.      We would like to suggest to Parks Canada to allow users to pay user and camping fees all year round. This is easily achieved with the current online booking system.
    3.      Users are fine to pay fees, but if Parks Canada is concerned about liability during the off-season, then users could continue to have access to the BGI without paying fees from October 1 – April 30th. This has worked in the BGI for decades and currently works in other National Parks.
    4.      Parks Canada could create a partnership with the guides and outfitters so they become the eyes and ears of Parks Canada in the BGI to report any issues (i.e. infractions) or significant wildlife reports.

    We encourage recreational kayakers and guides to voice their concerns and communicate with Dave Tovell, Visitor Experience Manager at Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (dave.tovell@canada.ca) and Karen Haugen, Superintendent at Pacific Rim National Park Reserve(karen.haugen@canada.ca).

    For me personally, the Broken Group is a fabulous location for an experienced paddler off season. It is a place to practice more advanced skills, train and enjoy solitude that is not available there is the summer. I find the behind-the-scenes decision-making very concerning and feel like this is another change that is geared toward out-of-province tourist use rather than a balance for local experienced users and visitors. Please do take time to research and write to the folks above. If this closure comes to fruition, we will need to take our game up a notch.

    Katya

    ReplyForward

     

    in reply to: Tools for Howe Sd? #18917
    George Prevost

    I think it’s worth saying over and over again how great it is that Nick and Steve and some of our other members have done such terrific work in developing and maintaining these sites, and that we as a club have been able to provide significant financial support.  The benefits will be felt for many years, not just by our members, but by all paddlers in our region and beyond.  Thank you, Nick, Steve and the rest!

    in reply to: General Discussion #18916
    Nick Heath

    Steve & I agreed that, now that we have lockable storage at each of the 6 Howe Sd Recreation sites under our stewardship, we should keep some basic maintenance  tools there, so that our Howe Sd Team members can travel by kayak without having to carry tools each time they visit.

    Before we head out and buy these tools, are there members who might have surplus ones they no longer want or need?

    We need: stiff broom, lopper,  bow (swede) saw, flat back or bow rake, long handle shovel,  mattock with pick or axe,  hoe (not a “Dutch Hoe”), hand trowel, club/lump/sledge hammer , axe or hatchet.

    If you have something you are willing to donate pl. send me a photo of it so I can see if it is what we are looking for.  My email address is treasurer2(at)skabc.org

    Pickup in the next few weeks or whenever it is convenient for you. No rush!

     

    in reply to: General Discussion #18913
    Nick Heath

    Many of us will qualify for the Prov government’s BC Recovery Benefit of $500 (individual) or $1000 (family).

    I’ve heard it said

    “I don’t really need this extra money, so I won’t claim it.”

    Laudable though that sentiment is, I suggest that there is many a charity that is struggling along on a  mere shoestring budget, so it might be better for that same individual to instead say:

    “I’ll claim the benefit, but donate it to (a) charitable cause(s) of my choice.” 

    BC Marine Trails Network Assn  could be one of those choices, alongside any other that the donor might choose, whether to achieve poverty reduction, wildlife conservation, medical research or whatever other purposes. BCMT have already helped with work that has benefitted sea kayakers in Howe Sd, Discovery Is, Quatsino and many other beautiful coastal areas.

    It is so easy!

    BC Marine Trails

    Registered Canadian charity #812142826 RR0001

    Please consider making a donation via Canada Helps!

    https://www.canadahelps.org/en/donate/

    in reply to: SKABC TRIPS 2021 #18912
    Former Member

    Good morning paddlers! The responses are starting to come in now from our Trips Catalog survey.

    Those kind enough to use the ‘Other’ item to provide suggestions, I have added your trips to the lists. No Marina, as fun as a club trip would be to the Baja or the Yukon, I had to set those aside.

    Early polling results, overall leaders for each category:

    Day Trips — Porteau Cove / Zorro Bay, Porteau Cove / Islet View
    Overnight Trips — S. Gulf Islands / Portland Island
    Expedition Trips — Port Hardy / God’s Pocket
    Activity Trips — Howe Sound / Camp Cooking Weekend **

    ** Most Votes Overall

    Those who filled out the poll already, you may want to take a look again. The options may have changed.

    Looking at the survey, I am now keen to know if people would be interested in going to a weighted vote mode. This is where you would not only select trips you would like to do, but put a value 1-3 to indicate which you would prefer most.

    Let me know what you think so far.

    in reply to: Book: Kyuquot & Nootka Sounds #18898
    Nick Heath

    I believe we already have it. We’d need to check that check with Lorraine.

    The author is our only Life Member, Heather Harbord, who now lives in Powell R.

    It is a good guide, but a bit dated.

    in reply to: Book: Kyuquot & Nootka Sounds #18897
    Peter Kearney

    Hi Edwin,  if you go ahead and purchase it for the club I would be happy to reimburse you.

    Cheers, Peter

Viewing 15 replies - 2,596 through 2,610 (of 4,427 total)